Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9500
- Successor is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9700 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S9700 was introduced 3 years later than the VR-330 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the S9700 scores against the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Olympus VR-330
| S9700 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | February 2011 | Fresher by 37 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon S9700
| VR-330 | S9700 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Olympus VR-330
| S9700 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S9700 offers physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the S9700 versus the VR-330.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S9700 and VR-330 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The photograph below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S9700 and VR-330.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Nikon S9700 to provide you with more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern S9700 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-02-07 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $350 | $220 |