Nikon S9700 vs Olympus XZ-1
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43


88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Released February 2014
- Succeeded the Nikon S9500
- Renewed by Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011

Nikon S9700 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Nikon S9700 and Olympus XZ-1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the S9700 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the S9700 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer different sensor sizes.

The S9700 was revealed 3 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the S9700 scores against the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon S9700 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9700 & Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are available at Nikon S9700 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Olympus XZ-1
S9700 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper display (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Nikon S9700
XZ-1 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Olympus XZ-1
S9700 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9700 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9700 enjoys physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9700 and Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the S9700 against the XZ-1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and XZ-1 is 90 and 88 respectively.

Nikon S9700 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The pic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S9700 and XZ-1.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S9700 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Nikon S9700 will give you more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The younger S9700 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Nikon S9700 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9700 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-02-07 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 99 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 320 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $350 | $567 |