Nikon S9700 vs Panasonic FH3
90 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Nikon S9700 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Superseded the Nikon S9500
- Successor is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9700 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Nikon S9700 versus Panasonic FH3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Panasonic. The resolution of the S9700 (16MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S9700 was revealed 4 years after the FH3 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S9700 scores versus the FH3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S9700 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Panasonic FH3
| S9700 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 50 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Nikon S9700
| FH3 | S9700 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Panasonic FH3
| S9700 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9700 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9700 has got physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic FH3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9700 versus Panasonic FH3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the S9700 and the FH3.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and FH3 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The picture here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9700 and FH3.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon S9700 to result in more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent S9700 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9700 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S9700 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $350 | $160 |