Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Older Model is Nikon S9500
- Successor is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also Known as WB650
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the S9700 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S9700 was launched 3 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the S9700 matches up against the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Samsung HZ35W
| S9700 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 45 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 614k | Sharper display (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Nikon S9700
| HZ35W | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Samsung HZ35W
| S9700 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9700 has outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the S9700 compared to the HZ35W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9700 and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9700 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S9700 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer S9700 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Alternative name | - | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 921k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $350 | $300 |