Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9500
- Renewed by Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S9700 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9700 was manufactured 3 years after the PL200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the S9700 scores vs the PL200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Samsung PL200
| S9700 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | July 2010 | Newer by 44 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Nikon S9700
| PL200 | S9700 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Samsung PL200
| S9700 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9700 has physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the S9700 compared to the PL200.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the S9700 and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specifications. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S9700 and PL200.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Nikon S9700 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent S9700 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Samsung PL200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 99 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $350 | $0 |