Nikon S9700 vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43


96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Launched February 2014
- Succeeded the Nikon S9500
- Replacement is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally Known as ES55

Nikon S9700 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Nikon S9700 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the S9700 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The S9700 was launched 5 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the S9700 matches up vs the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon S9700 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9700 and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9700 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Samsung SL102
S9700 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 62 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Nikon S9700
SL102 | S9700 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Samsung SL102
S9700 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Nikon S9700 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9700 enjoys outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9700 versus Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the S9700 and the SL102.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.

Nikon S9700 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S9700 and SL102.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Nikon S9700 to give you more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger S9700 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Nikon S9700 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9700 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Samsung SL102 |
Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-02-07 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 99 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | - |
Flash options | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $350 | $130 |