Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
78 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replaced the Olympus SP-800 UZ
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S9900 was introduced 3 years after the SP-810 UZ which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Nikon S9900 being a Compact camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S9900 scores against the SP-810 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus SP-810 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
| S9900 | SP-810 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 | July 2011 | More modern by 44 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Nikon S9900
| SP-810 UZ | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
| S9900 | SP-810 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon S9900 provides external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-810 UZ has specifications of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the S9900 vs the SP-810 UZ.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and SP-810 UZ is 88 and 78 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S9900 and SP-810 UZ.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Nikon S9900 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent S9900 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2011-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.9-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 1/4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 0.7 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 413g (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $300 | $280 |