Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 9000
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus 9000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S9900 was manufactured 5 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the S9900 matches up versus the 9000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus 9000
| S9900 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | May 2009 | More recent by 70 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Nikon S9900
| 9000 | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus 9000
| S9900 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S9900 features outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the S9900 and the 9000.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and 9000 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and 9000.
All in all, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon S9900 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher S9900 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also called | - | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 225 gr (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |