Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Older Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2014
- Successor is Olympus SH-2
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the SH-1 (16MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S9900 was revealed 11 months later than the SH-1 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the S9900 scores against the SH-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus SH-1
| S9900 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 | March 2014 | More recent by 11 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Nikon S9900
| SH-1 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus SH-1
| S9900 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9900 offers outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus SH-1 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the S9900 vs the SH-1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and SH-1 is 88 and 88 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and SH-1.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP and you can expect similar quality of photos although you will want to take the age of the products into consideration. The newer S9900 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $349 |