Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Previous Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus 6020, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S9900 was revealed 5 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the S9900 grades versus the 6020 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus 6020
S9900 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | February 2010 | More recent by 62 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Nikon S9900
6020 | S9900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus 6020
S9900 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 comes with external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the S9900 and the 6020.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and 6020 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The graphic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and 6020.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon S9900 to show greater detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher S9900 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 13MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 lbs) | 122g (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $279 |