Clicky

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020

Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
60
Overall
48
Nikon Coolpix S9900 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs

Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
  • 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
  • Revealed February 2015
  • Previous Model is Nikon S9700
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus 6020, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The S9900 was revealed 5 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the S9900 grades versus the 6020 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus 6020

 S9900 6020 
ReleasedFebruary 2015February 2010More recent by 62 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kCrisper screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Nikon S9900

 6020 S9900 

Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus 6020

 S9900 6020 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 comes with external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).

Examine the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the S9900 and the 6020.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and 6020 is 88 and 95 respectively.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The graphic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and 6020.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon S9900 to show greater detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher S9900 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon S9900
Portrait photography with Olympus 6020
37
MP count decent (16MP)
supports face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with Nikon S9900
Street photography with Olympus 6020
68
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (289 grams)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than others in class (122g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon S9900
Sports photography with Olympus 6020
53
great zoom range (25-750mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Nikon S9900 Travel photography info
Olympus 6020 Travel photography info
77
lighter than others (289g)
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
reasonably wide (25mm)
long zoom (750mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
70
lighter than others in class (122g)
weather sealing
decent sensor resolution (13 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S9900 Landscape photography information
Olympus 6020 Landscape photography information
47
reasonably wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
40
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (13MP)
weather sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9900 Vlogging features
Olympus 6020 Vlogging features
73
reasonably wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (289g)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
does not have external microphone port
31
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (122g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S9900 and Olympus 6020
 Nikon Coolpix S9900Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon Coolpix S9900 Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Also called as - mju Tough 6020
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2015-02-10 2010-02-02
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 13MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-750mm (30.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.7-6.4 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 921 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 1/4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 7.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) 4.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 289g (0.64 lbs) 122g (0.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL19 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $300 $279