Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e954/5e9542d25784543caa76545ef74cff6b508f001c" alt="Nikon Coolpix S9900 front Nikon Coolpix S9900 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c39/80c393637c7e1700b3dbd116480a434b8bf25baf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 8010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The S9900 was introduced 5 years later than the 8010 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the S9900 grades vs the 8010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus 8010
S9900 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 62 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Nikon S9900
8010 | S9900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus 8010
S9900 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9900 has got external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus 8010 has dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the S9900 compared to the 8010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ead46/ead46f1a4596badceaada5a8bc3b487de2757375" alt="Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9900 and 8010 is 88 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0902/c0902c3729ef11c0dda2cd11e5903fba88ee69c9" alt="Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S9900 and 8010.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Nikon S9900 to show more detail using its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern S9900 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99deb/99deb5aa0c218fa61624c7826b827f8cb2f3c570" alt="Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison"
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2308a/2308a25608e2a0e8a6b6db670283e81e65ddf98a" alt="Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 13MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 1/4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $300 | $600 |