Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-320
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Old Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly similar and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S9900 was announced 3 years later than the TG-320 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the S9900 matches up vs the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus TG-320
| S9900 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 38 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Nikon S9900
| TG-320 | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus TG-320
| S9900 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9900 has exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the S9900 against the TG-320.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and TG-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and TG-320.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Nikon S9900 to offer you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The newer S9900 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 150 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $0 |