Clicky

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
60
Overall
48
Nikon Coolpix S9900 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
  • 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
  • Launched February 2015
  • Superseded the Nikon S9700
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The S9900 was unveiled 3 years after the VR-320 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S9900 matches up versus the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus VR-320

 S9900 VR-320 
LaunchedFebruary 2015July 2011More modern by 44 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution921k230kClearer screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S9900

 VR-320 S9900 

Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus VR-320

 S9900 VR-320 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 provides outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S9900 vs the VR-320.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and VR-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S9900 and VR-320.

As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S9900 to deliver extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher S9900 will have an edge in sensor tech.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S9900 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography information
37
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
33
megapixel count good (14MP)
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Nikon S9900 Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Street photography highlights
68
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (289 grams)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon S9900
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
53
excellent zoom range (25-750mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Nikon S9900 Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
77
lighter than competition in class (289 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
reasonably wide (25mm)
great zoom (750mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S9900 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
47
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
42
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9900 Vlogging details
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging details
73
reasonably wide (25mm)
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (289g)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
missing mic jack
32
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S9900 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix S9900Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon Coolpix S9900 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2015-02-10 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-750mm (30.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/3.7-6.4 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 921k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 7.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) 4.70 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 289 gr (0.64 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL19 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $300 $179