Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48


94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The S9900 was unveiled 3 years after the VR-320 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S9900 matches up versus the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus VR-320
S9900 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 44 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon S9900
VR-320 | S9900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus VR-320
S9900 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 provides outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S9900 vs the VR-320.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and VR-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S9900 and VR-320.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S9900 to deliver extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher S9900 will have an edge in sensor tech.

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 gr (0.64 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $300 | $179 |