Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-330
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S9900 was announced 4 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the S9900 matches up versus the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus VR-330
| S9900 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 49 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon S9900
| VR-330 | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus VR-330
| S9900 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Nikon S9900 offers physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9900 versus Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the S9900 compared to the VR-330.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and VR-330 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The picture here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and VR-330.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Nikon S9900 to show extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher S9900 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Nikon S9900 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography factors
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features face detect focusing
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Nikon S9900 Street photography details
Olympus VR-330 Street photography details
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (289g)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Nikon S9900 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography highlights
long zoom range (25-750mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features tracking focus
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Nikon S9900 Travel photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography advice
lighter than competition (289g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (750mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
lighter than competitors (158g)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Nikon S9900 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography factors
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Nikon S9900 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (289 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
no microphone support
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $220 |