Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic FX75
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Previous Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Nikon S9900 versus Panasonic FX75, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S9900 was introduced 4 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the S9900 grades against the FX75 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Panasonic FX75
| S9900 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | June 2010 | More recent by 58 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Nikon S9900
| FX75 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Panasonic FX75
| S9900 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing |
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9900 has physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S9900 versus Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the S9900 vs the FX75.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and FX75 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and FX75.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon S9900 to show extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer S9900 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 7.40 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $139 |