Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic ZS35
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Nikon S9900 versus Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9900 was announced 14 months later than the ZS35 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the S9900 matches up vs the ZS35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Panasonic ZS35
| S9900 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 | January 2014 | More recent by 14 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Nikon S9900
| ZS35 | S9900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Panasonic ZS35
| S9900 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9900 enjoys exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has proportions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Nikon S9900 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the S9900 compared to the ZS35.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and ZS35 is 88 and 89 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S9900 and ZS35.
Clearly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP and you can expect comparable quality of files but you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher S9900 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon S9900 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $300 |