Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48


84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013

Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Pentax. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the S9900 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor size.

The S9900 was unveiled 20 months later than the MX-1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S9900 grades versus the MX-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Pentax MX-1. The full galleries are available at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Pentax MX-1
S9900 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2013 | More recent by 20 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Nikon S9900
MX-1 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Pentax MX-1
S9900 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9900 has got outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Pentax MX-1 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the S9900 vs the MX-1.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S9900 and MX-1 is 88 and 84 respectively.

Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S9900 and MX-1.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S9900 using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Nikon S9900 will provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern S9900 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Pentax |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Pentax MX-1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-02-10 | 2013-07-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | 391 grams (0.86 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 290 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $400 |