Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh CX2
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
Photography Glossary Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Nikon S9900 versus Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S9900 was announced 5 years after the CX2 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the S9900 grades versus the CX2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Ricoh CX2
| S9900 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 67 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Nikon S9900
| CX2 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Ricoh CX2
| S9900 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9900 enjoys outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S9900 versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the S9900 against the CX2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and CX2 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The image here will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and CX2.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S9900 to render more detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger S9900 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $341 |
