Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-50
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Nikon S9900 versus Ricoh WG-50, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S9900 was announced 3 years before the WG-50 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the S9900 scores versus the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Ricoh WG-50
| S9900 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Nikon S9900
| WG-50 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | February 2015 | Fresher by 27 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Ricoh WG-50
| S9900 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9900 offers physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9900 versus Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the S9900 against the WG-50.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and WG-50 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The graphic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and WG-50.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you will want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older S9900 will be behind in sensor tech.
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 300 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $280 |