Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-70
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Old Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Nikon S9900 versus Ricoh WG-70, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9900 was brought out 6 years before the WG-70 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the S9900 grades against the WG-70 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Ricoh WG-70
| S9900 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Nikon S9900
| WG-70 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | February 2015 | Fresher by 60 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Ricoh WG-70
| S9900 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9900 enjoys outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Nikon S9900 versus Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S9900 versus the WG-70.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and WG-70 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and WG-70.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you might want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The older S9900 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $300 | $280 |
