Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-80
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Previous Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-70
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Nikon S9900 versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S9900 was introduced 8 years prior to the WG-80 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S9900 scores versus the WG-80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Ricoh WG-80
| S9900 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Nikon S9900
| WG-80 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 | February 2015 | Newer by 88 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Ricoh WG-80
| S9900 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9900 offers external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Nikon S9900 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the S9900 and the WG-80.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9900 and WG-80 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9900 and WG-80.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of photos but you might want to take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged S9900 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon S9900 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2015-02-10 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $300 |