Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL350
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48


94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also referred to as WB2000

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Nikon S9900 versus Samsung TL350, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The S9900 was unveiled 5 years after the TL350 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the S9900 grades against the TL350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Samsung TL350. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Samsung TL350
S9900 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 61 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Nikon S9900
TL350 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Samsung TL350
S9900 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 has external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9900 versus Samsung TL350 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the S9900 against the TL350.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and TL350 is 88 and 94 respectively.

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and TL350.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Nikon S9900 to resolve extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern S9900 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Samsung TL350 |
Also called as | - | WB2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 grams (0.64 pounds) | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $400 |