Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB150F
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Nikon S9900 and Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S9900 was launched 3 years after the WB150F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the S9900 scores versus the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Samsung WB150F. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Samsung WB150F
| S9900 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 38 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Nikon S9900
| WB150F | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Samsung WB150F
| S9900 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon S9900 features exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S9900 and Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the S9900 versus the WB150F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and WB150F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The image here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and WB150F.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Nikon S9900 to show more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern S9900 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-02-10 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 188 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $230 |