Clicky

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
60
Overall
48
Nikon Coolpix S9900 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
  • 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
  • Introduced February 2015
  • Succeeded the Nikon S9700
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Launched January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Following is a in depth assessment of the Nikon S9900 and Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The S9900 was released 14 months after the WB350F making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the S9900 grades vs the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Samsung WB350F

 S9900 WB350F 
LaunchedFebruary 2015January 2014More modern by 14 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution921k460kClearer display (+461k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Nikon S9900

 WB350F S9900 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Samsung WB350F

 S9900 WB350F 
Display size3"3"Same display measurement

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S9900 provides external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Contrast the Nikon S9900 and Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S9900 versus the WB350F.

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S9900 and WB350F is 88 and 90 respectively.

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S9900 and WB350F.

To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you may want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern S9900 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S9900 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Portrait photography camera
37
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
40
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Nikon S9900 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Street photography camera
68
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (289 grams)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (276 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Nikon S9900 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB350F Sports photography factors
53
great zoom range (25-750mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
50
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Nikon S9900 Travel photography info
Samsung WB350F Travel photography info
77
lighter than competitors in class (289 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
relatively wide (25mm)
great zoom (750mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
69
lighter than competition in class (276g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (23mm)
great zoom (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon S9900
Landscape photography with Samsung WB350F
47
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
50
has manual focus
really wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon S9900
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
73
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (289g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
lack of microphone jack
34
really wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (276 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Nikon S9900 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S9900 and Samsung WB350F
 Nikon Coolpix S9900Samsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Nikon Samsung
Model Nikon Coolpix S9900 Samsung WB350F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2015-02-10 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-750mm (30.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.7-6.4 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 921k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 7.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 289 gr (0.64 lbs) 276 gr (0.61 lbs)
Physical dimensions 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL19 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $300 $260