Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
![Nikon Coolpix W300 front Nikon Coolpix W300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-W300/Nikon-W300-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-800-UZ/Olympus-SP-800-UZ-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Let's look more closely at the Nikon W300 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The W300 was announced 7 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the W300 matches up versus the SP-800 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon W300 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
W300 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 90 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Nikon W300
SP-800 UZ | W300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
W300 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon W300 offers external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Nikon W300 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the W300 vs the SP-800 UZ.
![Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-W300-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the W300 and SP-800 UZ is 91 and 69 respectively.
![Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-W300-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The photograph below may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the W300 and SP-800 UZ.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Nikon W300 to resolve greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher W300 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-W300-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-W300-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2017-05-31 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | - | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 12 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 231 grams (0.51 lbs) | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Built-in | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $387 | $270 |