Nikon W300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Launched January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon W300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Nikon W300 versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe W300 was brought out 4 years later than the SZ-16 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the W300 grades vs the SZ-16 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon W300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon W300 Gallery and Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| W300 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 54 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Nikon W300
| SZ-16 iHS | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| W300 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon W300 comes with physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Nikon W300 versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the W300 versus the SZ-16 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the W300 and SZ-16 iHS is 91 and 89 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the W300 and SZ-16 iHS.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels so you should expect similar quality of images however you will need to take the release date of the products into consideration. The fresher W300 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon W300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2017-05-31 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 lbs) | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 images | 220 images |
| Battery type | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $387 | $230 |