Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
![Nikon Coolpix W300 front Nikon Coolpix W300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-W300/Nikon-W300-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000/Olympus-6000-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Nikon W300 versus Olympus 6000, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and 6000 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The W300 was launched 8 years after the 6000 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the W300 grades against the 6000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The complete galleries are available at Nikon W300 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus 6000
W300 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 97 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Nikon W300
6000 | W300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus 6000
W300 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon W300 offers outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon W300 versus Olympus 6000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the W300 against the 6000.
![Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-W300-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the W300 and 6000 is 91 and 94 respectively.
![Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-W300-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the W300 and 6000.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon W300 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher W300 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
![Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-W300-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-W300-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon W300 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Alternative name | - | mju Tough 6000 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-05-31 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | - | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 50 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 231g (0.51 pounds) | 179g (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 shots | - |
Type of battery | Built-in | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $387 | $259 |