Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe W300 was revealed 2 years later than the TG-860 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon W300 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the W300 matches up versus the TG-860 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are available at Nikon W300 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus TG-860
| W300 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | February 2015 | More recent by 29 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Nikon W300
| TG-860 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus TG-860
| W300 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon W300 provides outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the W300 against the TG-860.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the W300 and TG-860 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the W300 and TG-860.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you will need to consider the age of the cameras into account. The fresher W300 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2017-05-31 | 2015-02-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 grams (0.51 lbs) | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery format | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $387 | $279 |
