Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photography Glossary Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe W300 was revealed 6 years later than the TG-310 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the W300 scores vs the TG-310 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are provided at Nikon W300 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus TG-310
| W300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 78 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Nikon W300
| TG-310 | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus TG-310
| W300 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon W300 features physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the W300 versus the TG-310.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the W300 and TG-310 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The photograph underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the W300 and TG-310.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon W300 to give you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent W300 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2017-05-31 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 231g (0.51 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 shots | 150 shots |
| Type of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $387 | $0 |