Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe W300 was unveiled 4 years later than the TG-630 iHS and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the W300 scores vs the TG-630 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon W300 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| W300 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 54 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Nikon W300
| TG-630 iHS | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| W300 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon W300 enjoys outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the W300 compared to the TG-630 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the W300 and TG-630 iHS is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The visual below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the W300 and TG-630 iHS.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Nikon W300 to offer greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher W300 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2017-05-31 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 shots | 220 shots |
| Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $387 | $200 |