Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Nikon W300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe W300 was introduced 3 years after the TG-2 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the W300 matches up vs the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon W300 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| W300 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | June 2013 | Newer by 48 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 610k | Crisper display (+311k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Nikon W300
| TG-2 iHS | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| W300 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon W300 comes with physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon W300 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the W300 versus the TG-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the W300 and TG-2 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the W300 and TG-2 iHS.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon W300 to give extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent W300 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon W300 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2017-05-31 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | - | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 231g (0.51 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Type of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $387 | $380 |