Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe W300 was revealed 5 years after the VG-160 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the W300 grades versus the VG-160 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are provided at Nikon W300 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus VG-160
| W300 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 66 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Nikon W300
| VG-160 | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus VG-160
| W300 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon W300 features external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the W300 versus the VG-160.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the W300 and VG-160 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The image underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the W300 and VG-160.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon W300 to provide greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher W300 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2017-05-31 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 231g (0.51 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 images | 165 images |
| Battery type | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $387 | $90 |