Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe W300 was released 5 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the W300 matches up vs the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon W300 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus VR-320
| W300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 72 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon W300
| VR-320 | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus VR-320
| W300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon W300 features exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the W300 versus the VR-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the W300 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the W300 and VR-320.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Nikon W300 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger W300 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2017-05-31 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $387 | $179 |