Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Let's look closer at the Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe W300 was manufactured 6 years after the VR-330 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the W300 grades vs the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon W300 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus VR-330
| W300 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 77 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon W300
| VR-330 | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus VR-330
| W300 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon W300 has got physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the W300 vs the VR-330.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the W300 and VR-330 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The pic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the W300 and VR-330.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon W300 to offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher W300 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon W300 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2017-05-31 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $387 | $220 |