Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the W300 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe W300 was revealed 6 years later than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the W300 scores against the XZ-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon W300 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus XZ-1
| W300 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 | January 2011 | More recent by 78 months | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 614k | Crisper display (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Nikon W300
| XZ-1 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus XZ-1
| W300 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon W300 has exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the W300 vs the XZ-1.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the W300 and XZ-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the W300 and XZ-1.
As you can see, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The W300 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Nikon W300 will render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher W300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon W300 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-05-31 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 lbs) | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 images | 320 images |
| Form of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $387 | $567 |