Nikon W300 vs Panasonic FX700
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
94 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Nikon W300 vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon W300 vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Nikon W300 and Panasonic FX700, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Panasonic. The image resolution of the W300 (16MP) and the FX700 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe W300 was revealed 6 years later than the FX700 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the W300 scores versus the FX700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon W300 vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon W300 Gallery & Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Panasonic FX700
| W300 | FX700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 | July 2010 | Fresher by 84 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Nikon W300
| FX700 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Panasonic FX700
| W300 | FX700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon W300 vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon W300 enjoys outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Panasonic FX700 has proportions of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon W300 and Panasonic FX700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the W300 against the FX700.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the W300 and FX700 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the W300 and FX700.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon W300 to provide more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer W300 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Nikon W300 vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon W300 vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2017-05-31 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 7.40 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 grams (0.51 pounds) | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $387 | $399 |