Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX1
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2017
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Nikon W300 versus Ricoh CX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe W300 was launched 8 years after the CX1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the W300 scores vs the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are available at Nikon W300 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Ricoh CX1
| W300 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Nikon W300
| CX1 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Ricoh CX1
| W300 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon W300 features physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Examine the Nikon W300 versus Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the W300 vs the CX1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the W300 and CX1 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the W300 and CX1.
Clearly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Nikon W300 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher W300 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2017-05-31 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 grams (0.51 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 shots | - |
| Battery style | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $387 | $299 |