Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aee1/4aee12b895a4d014adcf4044eeab456c50dee3ed" alt="Nikon Coolpix W300 front Nikon Coolpix W300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b47f9/b47f930de28b117873fba531eee680f0fd88065c" alt="Ricoh CX3 front Ricoh CX3 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Launched May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Nikon W300 and Ricoh CX3, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The W300 was brought out 7 years after the CX3 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the W300 scores against the CX3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon W300 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Ricoh CX3
W300 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 85 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Nikon W300
CX3 | W300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Ricoh CX3
W300 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon W300 features physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Nikon W300 and Ricoh CX3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the W300 versus the CX3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2659a/2659a2b016f1c16dd02f1c44242ab06777885764" alt="Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the W300 and CX3 is 91 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9762/e9762980fe275932a5475001dc5bfb99e95967fe" alt="Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The pic here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the W300 and CX3.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Nikon W300 to offer greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger W300 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1d12/a1d12d9b2d4e469b3edb1d065080c6bec3b95497" alt="Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison"
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a80c/2a80c49dfa820d9c54628d6d8e3c26ae68241c87" alt="Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Nikon W300 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix W300 | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Ricoh CX3 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2017-05-31 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | - | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 231 grams (0.51 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 shots | - |
Type of battery | Built-in | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $387 | $329 |