Nikon W300 vs Samsung HZ35W
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon W300 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon W300 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Nikon W300 versus Samsung HZ35W, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe W300 was introduced 7 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the W300 scores versus the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon W300 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon W300 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Samsung HZ35W
| W300 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 85 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 614k | Clearer screen (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Nikon W300
| HZ35W | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Samsung HZ35W
| W300 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon W300 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon W300 has outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon W300 versus Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the W300 against the HZ35W.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the W300 and HZ35W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the W300 and HZ35W.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Nikon W300 to result in greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent W300 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon W300 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon W300 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2017-05-31 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 921 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231g (0.51 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 shots | - |
| Battery style | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $387 | $300 |