Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aee1/4aee12b895a4d014adcf4044eeab456c50dee3ed" alt="Nikon Coolpix W300 front Nikon Coolpix W300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7e4/ea7e4ee78f1fa0fb4022ac36c31077cfef4a19c1" alt="Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Released May 2017
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Nikon W300 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The W300 was introduced 8 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the W300 matches up versus the SL102 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix W300 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon W300 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Samsung SL102
W300 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 103 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Nikon W300
SL102 | W300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Samsung SL102
W300 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon W300 has got external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon W300 versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the W300 versus the SL102.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37661/376615da876316c6d0533fb37d6146a9392238c9" alt="Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the W300 and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bef7/7bef7a0bc8a80d71d1cff010b512d2337dfc2208" alt="Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the W300 and SL102.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon W300 to resolve greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The younger W300 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37f31/37f31e7897d62b0586be73c7b7e6d99b8c7d7b68" alt="Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison"
Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1b1c/b1b1ccb54423078c353d8b906ee3e4cdf9cf5351" alt="Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon W300 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix W300 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Samsung SL102 |
Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-05-31 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | - | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 231g (0.51 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | - |
Type of battery | Built-in | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $387 | $130 |