Clicky

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300

Portability
55
Imaging
48
Features
45
Overall
46
Nikon D200 front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Nikon D200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 920g - 147 x 113 x 74mm
  • Announced February 2006
  • Older Model is Nikon D100
  • Later Model is Nikon D300
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Nikon D200 versus Olympus E-300, both Advanced DSLR cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the D200 (10MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the D200 (APS-C) and E-300 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The D200 was introduced 14 months after the E-300 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).

Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the D200 matches up against the E-300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon D200 over the Olympus E-300

 D200 E-300 
RevealedFebruary 2006January 2005Newer by 14 months
Screen dimensions2.5"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.7")
Screen resolution230k134kSharper screen (+96k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Nikon D200

 E-300 D200 

Common features in the Nikon D200 and Olympus E-300

 D200 E-300 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

When you are going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon D200 has got exterior dimensions of 147mm x 113mm x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") having a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) and the Olympus E-300 has specifications of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Nikon D200 versus Olympus E-300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the D200 versus the E-300.

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D200 and E-300 is 55 and 67 respectively.

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the D200 and E-300.

Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The D200 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Nikon D200 will produce more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern D200 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon D200
Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
52
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Nikon D200 Street photography details
Olympus E-300 Street photography details
55
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon D200
Sports photography with Olympus E-300
51
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Nikon D200 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
51
weather sealing
has built in flash
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
45
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon D200
Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
52
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Nikon F mount)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
small screen (2.5")
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (1.8 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon D200 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
9
no video recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D200 and Olympus E-300
 Nikon D200Olympus E-300
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon D200 Olympus E-300
Also called - EVOLT E-300
Category Advanced DSLR Advanced DSLR
Announced 2006-02-23 2005-01-10
Body design Mid-size SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.8mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 372.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 8 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Maximum resolution 3872 x 2592 3264 x 2448
Maximum native ISO 1600 400
Maximum boosted ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 309 45
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 1.8 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 134 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.63x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m -
Flash options Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Maximum video resolution None None
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 920 grams (2.03 lbs) 624 grams (1.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 113 x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 64 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 583 not tested
Other
Battery ID EN-EL3e -
Self timer Yes (2 to 20 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $999 $800