Clicky

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400

Portability
67
Imaging
64
Features
63
Overall
63
Nikon D3200 front
 
Olympus E-400 front
Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs

Nikon D3200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 505g - 125 x 96 x 77mm
  • Launched July 2012
  • Superseded the Nikon D3100
  • Renewed by Nikon D3300
Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-410
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 Overview

Following is a in depth review of the Nikon D3200 versus Olympus E-400, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the D3200 (24MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the D3200 (APS-C) and E-400 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The D3200 was announced 5 years after the E-400 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the D3200 grades against the E-400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon D3200 over the Olympus E-400

 D3200 E-400 
LaunchedJuly 2012September 2006More modern by 72 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kCrisper screen (+706k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Nikon D3200

 E-400 D3200 

Common features in the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-400

 D3200 E-400 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon D3200 comes with exterior dimensions of 125mm x 96mm x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs) and the Olympus E-400 has sizing of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Analyze the Nikon D3200 versus Olympus E-400 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the D3200 compared to the E-400.

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the D3200 and E-400 is 67 and 77 respectively.

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the D3200 and E-400.

As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The D3200 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Nikon D3200 will result in extra detail with its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher D3200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 sensor size comparison

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon D3200 Portrait photography features
Olympus E-400 Portrait photography features
78
you can focus manually
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focus
supports RAW formats
46
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
no manual mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Street Comparison

Nikon D3200 Street photography info
Olympus E-400 Street photography info
60
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Nikon D3200 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
65
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
max frames per second low (4.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Nikon D3200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
59
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
49
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon D3200
Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
69
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Nikon F mount)
screen is a good size (3")
good megapixels (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon D3200 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-400 Vlogging factors
27
includes face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone socket
9
no video shooting
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-400
 Nikon D3200Olympus E-400
General Information
Make Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon D3200 Olympus E-400
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2012-07-25 2006-09-14
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Expeed 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.2 x 15.4mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 357.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 6016 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 11 3
Cross type focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens mount type Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 309 45
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.5"
Display resolution 921k dots 215k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT LCD with 160� viewing angle -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.53x 0.46x
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/200s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Optional None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 505 grams (1.11 pounds) 435 grams (0.96 pounds)
Physical dimensions 125 x 96 x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 81 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 24.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1131 not tested
Other
Battery life 540 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL14 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots One One
Cost at release $530 $599