Nikon D3200 vs Sony A290
67 Imaging
64 Features
63 Overall
63
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 505g - 125 x 96 x 77mm
- Announced July 2012
- Older Model is Nikon D3100
- Renewed by Nikon D3300
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced June 2010
- Superseded the Sony A230
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon D3200 vs Sony A290 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Nikon D3200 versus Sony A290, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the D3200 (24MP) and A290 (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe D3200 was released 2 years later than the A290 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the D3200 grades versus the A290 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon D3200 vs Sony A290 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon D3200 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon D3200 Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3200 over the Sony A290
| D3200 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2012 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 26 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Nikon D3200
| A290 | D3200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D3200 and Sony A290
| D3200 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon D3200 has got physical dimensions of 125mm x 96mm x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon D3200 versus Sony A290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the D3200 versus the A290.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the D3200 and A290 is 67 and 66 respectively.
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the D3200 and A290.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon D3200 to render more detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern D3200 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A290 Specifications
| Nikon D3200 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon D3200 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2012-07-25 | 2010-06-09 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed 3 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 357.3mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 6016 x 4000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Nikon F | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 309 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD with 160� viewing angle | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 505 gr (1.11 pounds) | 549 gr (1.21 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 96 x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 81 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.1 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.2 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 1131 | 615 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 540 photographs | 290 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL14 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $530 | $600 |
