Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68
67 Imaging
64 Features
63 Overall
63
![Nikon D3200 front Nikon D3200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-D3200/Nikon-D3200-front.jpg)
![Sony SLT-A68 front Sony SLT-A68 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-SLT-A68/Sony-A68-front.jpg)
64 Imaging
67 Features
70 Overall
68
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 505g - 125 x 96 x 77mm
- Released July 2012
- Previous Model is Nikon D3100
- Successor is Nikon D3300
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Announced November 2015
- Old Model is Sony A65
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Nikon D3200 and Sony A68, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by brands Nikon and Sony. The resolution of the D3200 (24MP) and the A68 (24MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (APS-C).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The D3200 was launched 4 years prior to the A68 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the D3200 scores vs the A68 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon D3200 and Sony SLT-A68. The complete galleries are available at Nikon D3200 Gallery and Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3200 over the Sony A68
D3200 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Nikon D3200
A68 | D3200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2015 | ![]() | July 2012 | More modern by 39 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Nikon D3200 and Sony A68
D3200 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon D3200 offers physical measurements of 125mm x 96mm x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs) and the Sony A68 has sizing of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
See the Nikon D3200 and Sony A68 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the D3200 against the A68.
![Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 size comparison Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-D3200-vs-Sony-SLT-A68-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the D3200 and A68 is 67 and 64 respectively.
![Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-D3200-vs-Sony-SLT-A68-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The image here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the D3200 and A68.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of files though you will need to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged D3200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
![Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-D3200-vs-Sony-SLT-A68-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-D3200-vs-Sony-SLT-A68-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon D3200 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Nikon D3200 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Sony |
Model | Nikon D3200 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2012-07-25 | 2015-11-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed 3 | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 357.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6016 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 79 |
Cross focus points | 1 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Nikon F | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 309 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD with 160� viewing angle | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 505 gr (1.11 lb) | 610 gr (1.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 96 x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 81 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.1 | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.2 | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | 1131 | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 pictures | 510 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL14 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $530 | $581 |