Clicky

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400

Portability
69
Imaging
66
Features
72
Overall
68
Nikon D3300 front
 
Olympus E-400 front
Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs

Nikon D3300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 430g - 124 x 98 x 76mm
  • Released April 2014
  • Older Model is Nikon D3200
  • Renewed by Nikon D3400
Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the D3300 (24MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the D3300 (APS-C) and E-400 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The D3300 was manufactured 7 years later than the E-400 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the D3300 matches up vs the E-400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon D3300 over the Olympus E-400

 D3300 E-400 
RevealedApril 2014September 2006Fresher by 93 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kSharper screen (+706k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Nikon D3300

 E-400 D3300 

Common features in the Nikon D3300 and Olympus E-400

 D3300 E-400 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon D3300 enjoys outer dimensions of 124mm x 98mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 430 grams (0.95 lbs) and the Olympus E-400 has proportions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Compare the Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the D3300 versus the E-400.

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D3300 and E-400 is 69 and 77 respectively.

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the D3300 and E-400.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The D3300 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Nikon D3300 will offer you more detail due to its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher D3300 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 sensor size comparison

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon D3300
Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
79
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
46
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
does not have liveview
manual mode not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Nikon D3300 Street photography features
Olympus E-400 Street photography features
65
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than average in class (430 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon D3300
Sports photography with Olympus E-400
68
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery (700 CIPA)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Nikon D3300
Travel photography with Olympus E-400
67
better than average battery (700 per charge)
lighter than average in class (430 grams)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
49
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Nikon D3300 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-400 Landscape photography details
73
has manual focus
change lenses (Nikon F mount)
nice screen size (3")
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
doesnt have low pass filter
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (700 per charge)
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
45
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon D3300 Vlogging info
Olympus E-400 Vlogging info
33
has face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with external microphone jack
lighter than average in class (430g)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
9
lack of video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D3300 and Olympus E-400
 Nikon D3300Olympus E-400
General Information
Make Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon D3300 Olympus E-400
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2014-04-21 2006-09-14
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed 4 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Max resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Max enhanced ISO 25600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 3
Cross type focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens support Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 309 45
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.5"
Screen resolution 921 thousand dot 215 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT LCD (160 degree viewing angle) -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.57x 0.46x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/200 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p fps), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Optional None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 430g (0.95 pounds) 435g (0.96 pounds)
Dimensions 124 x 98 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 82 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 24.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1385 not tested
Other
Battery life 700 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL14a -
Self timer Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $500 $599