Clicky

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520

Portability
69
Imaging
66
Features
72
Overall
68
Nikon D3300 front
 
Olympus E-520 front
Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs

Nikon D3300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 430g - 124 x 98 x 76mm
  • Announced April 2014
  • Old Model is Nikon D3200
  • Replacement is Nikon D3400
Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Introduced August 2008
  • Older Model is Olympus E-510
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Nikon D3300 and Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the D3300 (24MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the D3300 (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The D3300 was launched 5 years later than the E-520 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the D3300 grades versus the E-520 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon D3300 over the Olympus E-520

 D3300 E-520 
IntroducedApril 2014August 2008Fresher by 69 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Nikon D3300

 E-520 D3300 

Common features in the Nikon D3300 and Olympus E-520

 D3300 E-520 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon D3300 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 98mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 430 grams (0.95 lbs) while the Olympus E-520 has dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).

Examine the Nikon D3300 and Olympus E-520 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the D3300 against the E-520.

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D3300 and E-520 is 69 and 68 respectively.

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The visual here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the D3300 and E-520.

All in all, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The D3300 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Nikon D3300 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent D3300 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon D3300 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-520 Portrait photography factors
79
focusing manually
MP count decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focus
saves RAW files
59
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW files
MP count low (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Nikon D3300 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-520 Street photography highlights
65
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (430g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Nikon D3300 Sports photography info
Olympus E-520 Sports photography info
68
MP count decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery (700 CIPA)
has phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great battery life (650 CIPA)
supports phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
MP count low (10MP)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Nikon D3300 Travel photography info
Olympus E-520 Travel photography info
67
great battery (700 per charge)
lighter than competition (430 grams)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
52
great battery life (650 CIPA)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Nikon D3300 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-520 Landscape photography factors
73
focusing manually
swap lenses (Nikon F mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
MP count decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
no anti-alias filter
saves RAW files
great battery (700 shots)
does not have image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
58
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (650 shots)
small screen (2.7")
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon D3300 Vlogging info
Olympus E-520 Vlogging info
33
includes face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has external microphone socket
lighter than competition (430g)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
9
no video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Nikon D3300 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D3300 and Olympus E-520
 Nikon D3300Olympus E-520
General Information
Manufacturer Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon D3300 Olympus E-520
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2014-04-21 2008-08-20
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Expeed 4 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 12800 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 25600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 11 3
Cross focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 309 45
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 921k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT LCD (160 degree viewing angle) -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.57x 0.46x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/200 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p fps), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Optional None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 430g (0.95 lbs) 552g (1.22 lbs)
Dimensions 124 x 98 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 82 55
DXO Color Depth score 24.3 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 10.4
DXO Low light score 1385 548
Other
Battery life 700 photos 650 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model EN-EL14a -
Self timer Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $500 $400