Nikon D3400 vs Sony A200
70 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Nikon D3400 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 395g - 124 x 98 x 76mm
- Revealed August 2016
- Replaced the Nikon D3300
- Replacement is Nikon D3500
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon D3400 vs Sony A200 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Nikon D3400 and Sony A200, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by companies Nikon and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the D3400 (24MP) and A200 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe D3400 was brought out 8 years later than the A200 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the D3400 grades vs the A200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon D3400 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon D3400 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon D3400 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3400 over the Sony A200
| D3400 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2016 |  | July 2008 | Fresher by 99 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Nikon D3400
| A200 | D3400 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D3400 and Sony A200
| D3400 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon D3400 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon D3400 has outside dimensions of 124mm x 98mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check out the Nikon D3400 and Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the D3400 vs the A200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D3400 and A200 is 70 and 66 respectively.
Nikon D3400 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the D3400 and A200.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon D3400 to offer you more detail having its extra 14MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern D3400 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon D3400 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon D3400 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Nikon D3400 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Sony |
| Model | Nikon D3400 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2016-08-17 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon F | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 309 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 395 gr (0.87 lb) | 572 gr (1.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 98 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 86 | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.8 | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.9 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 1192 | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 1200 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL14a | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $397 | $100 |