Clicky

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300

Portability
72
Imaging
68
Features
70
Overall
68
Nikon D3500 front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Nikon D3500
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 365g - 124 x 97 x 70mm
  • Introduced August 2018
  • Old Model is Nikon D3400
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 Overview

In this article, we are contrasting the Nikon D3500 and Olympus E-300, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the D3500 (24MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the D3500 (APS-C) and E-300 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The D3500 was introduced 13 years after the E-300 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon D3500 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the D3500 scores versus the E-300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Nikon D3500 over the Olympus E-300

 D3500 E-300 
IntroducedAugust 2018January 2005Newer by 166 months
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution921k134kCrisper display (+787k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Nikon D3500

 E-300 D3500 

Common features in the Nikon D3500 and Olympus E-300

 D3500 E-300 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon D3500 enjoys exterior measurements of 124mm x 97mm x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 365 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-300 has measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Look at the Nikon D3500 and Olympus E-300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the D3500 vs the E-300.

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D3500 and E-300 is 72 and 67 respectively.

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through specs. The image underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the D3500 and E-300.

All in all, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The D3500 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Nikon D3500 will show extra detail using its extra 16MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The younger D3500 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon D3500 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-300 Portrait photography advice
80
focusing manually
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
exports RAW files
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview
low MP (8MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Nikon D3500 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
69
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than average in class (365 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Nikon D3500 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
69
decent megapixels (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery power (1,550 shots)
sensor has phase detect AF
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Nikon D3500 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
70
great battery power (1,550 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (365 grams)
has bluetooth
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
45
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low MP (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Nikon D3500 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-300 Landscape photography advice
75
focusing manually
change lenses (Nikon F mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
does not have anti-alias filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
great battery power (1,550 shots)
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse function
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (1.8")
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon D3500
Vlogging with Olympus E-300
31
supports face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (365 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
lack of external microphone port
9
can't shoot video
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon D3500 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D3500 and Olympus E-300
 Nikon D3500Olympus E-300
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon D3500 Olympus E-300
Also called - EVOLT E-300
Category Entry-Level DSLR Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2018-08-29 2005-01-10
Body design Compact SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Expeed 4 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 8 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO 25600 400
Highest boosted ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 3
Lens
Lens mounting type Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 309 45
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 1.8"
Resolution of display 921k dot 134k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash modes Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 365 grams (0.80 lb) 624 grams (1.38 lb)
Dimensions 124 x 97 x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 1550 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model EN-EL14a -
Self timer Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $397 $800