Nikon D3500 vs Sony A200
72 Imaging
69 Features
70 Overall
69
66 Imaging
50 Features
38 Overall
45
Nikon D3500 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 365g - 124 x 97 x 70mm
- Introduced August 2018
- Superseded the Nikon D3400
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Launched July 2008
- Later Model is Sony A230
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon D3500 vs Sony A200 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Nikon D3500 versus Sony A200, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the D3500 (24MP) and A200 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (APS-C).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe D3500 was manufactured 10 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the D3500 grades versus the A200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon D3500 vs Sony A200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon D3500 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon D3500 Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3500 over the Sony A200
| D3500 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2018 |  | July 2008 | More recent by 124 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Nikon D3500
| A200 | D3500 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D3500 and Sony A200
| D3500 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon D3500 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon D3500 comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 97mm x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 365 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Nikon D3500 versus Sony A200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the D3500 vs the A200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the D3500 and A200 is 72 and 66 respectively.
Nikon D3500 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the D3500 and A200.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Nikon D3500 to render greater detail due to its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer D3500 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon D3500 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Nikon D3500 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Nikon D3500 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon D3500 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2018-08-29 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Nikon F | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 309 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 365 gr (0.80 lbs) | 572 gr (1.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 97 x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 1550 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL14a | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $397 | $100 |
