Clicky

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520

Portability
66
Imaging
65
Features
77
Overall
69
Nikon D5200 front
 
Olympus E-520 front
Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs

Nikon D5200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 555g - 129 x 98 x 78mm
  • Introduced May 2013
  • Superseded the Nikon D5100
  • Renewed by Nikon D5300
Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-510
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 Overview

In this article, we are looking at the Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the D5200 (24MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the D5200 (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The D5200 was launched 4 years after the E-520 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the D5200 matches up versus the E-520 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon D5200 over the Olympus E-520

 D5200 E-520 
LaunchedMay 2013August 2008More modern by 58 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kClearer display (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Nikon D5200

 E-520 D5200 

Common features in the Nikon D5200 and Olympus E-520

 D5200 E-520 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon D5200 comes with exterior dimensions of 129mm x 98mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.9" x 3.1") with a weight of 555 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-520 has sizing of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).

See the Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the D5200 versus the E-520.

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the D5200 and E-520 is 66 and 68 respectively.

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the D5200 and E-520.

As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The D5200 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Nikon D5200 will render greater detail utilizing its extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer D5200 provides an advantage in sensor tech.

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon D5200 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Portrait photography camera
79
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
59
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Nikon D5200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Street photography camera
69
screen articulates
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Nikon D5200 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
61
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
has phase detect autofocus
max fps low (5.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
bad battery life (500 per charge)
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
better than average battery power (650 shots)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
max frames per second low (4.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Nikon D5200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
69
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery life (500 shots)
52
better than average battery power (650 shots)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon D5200
Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
70
manual focus
swap lenses (Nikon F mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
58
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (650 shots)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon D5200 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-520 Vlogging advice
71
screen is selfie friendly
has face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has external microphone port
lack of image stabilization
9
no video recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon D5200 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D5200 and Olympus E-520
 Nikon D5200Olympus E-520
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model Nikon D5200 Olympus E-520
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2013-05-16 2008-08-20
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Expeed 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Max boosted ISO 25600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 39 3
Cross focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 309 45
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 921k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.52x 0.46x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/200 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Optional None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 555 gr (1.22 pounds) 552 gr (1.22 pounds)
Dimensions 129 x 98 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.9" x 3.1") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 55
DXO Color Depth score 24.2 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score 13.9 10.4
DXO Low light score 1284 548
Other
Battery life 500 shots 650 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model EN-EL14 -
Self timer Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $595 $400